I found this article very
intriguing. Everyone knows that television has effects on people, but I don’t
think people understand the full scope of it. As a side note, I thought it was
funny how Iyengar said that people spend more time in front of screens rather
than in interpersonal interaction. I had a read an article last year how social
scientists were studying the social behaviors of men toward women, and they
said men who play videogames are losing the confidence to flirt and approach
women.
To get back on topic, it is
true that t.v. news gives way more attention to events and occurrences and not
on issues that can’t be reduced to short clips. I think this is why there
really isn’t much discussion on the environment and quality of reservations
like Dillon had mentioned. There are plenty of issues that the public is
unaware of because of this. Therefore, politicians are not being questioned
about issues that are important but overlooked.
When it comes to elections,
it is true that news stations focus on the turnout and swing states. They do
focus on the candidates’ platforms, but only on the standard issues. T.V. news
always needs to provide more context even if it’s hard news or a thematic
event. I think more people would vote if they knew more about their platforms
in regards to other issues.
This articles demonstrates the power journalists have in shaping public thought and political discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment